You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Evaluating Claims People Make about Themselves: The Development of Skepticism
Gail D. Heyman, Genyue Fu and Kang Lee
Vol. 78, No. 2 (Mar. - Apr., 2007), pp. 367-375
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4139233
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Child psychology, Children, Psychological assessment, Age groups, Child development, Reasoning, Modesty, Elementary school students, Developmental psychology, Psychology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The way in which children evaluate people's claims about their own psychological characteristics was examined. Among children ages 6-11 from the United States and China (total N=243), there was an age-related increase in skepticism about self-report concerning the highly value-laden characteristics honest, smart, and nice, but not concerning less value-laden characteristics. There were also differences between the countries: children from China showed greater skepticism about value-laden characteristics, and were more likely to assume that others might lie about characteristics that lack strong evaluative implications. Older children from China were especially likely to expect individuals to act in ways that are consistent with modesty norms when communicating about themselves.
Child Development © 2007 Society for Research in Child Development