You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Embedding "If and Only If"
Adam Sennet and Jonathan Weisberg
Journal of Philosophical Logic
Vol. 41, No. 2 (April 2012), pp. 449-460
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41427285
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Biconditionals, Conditional probabilities, Indicative conditionals, Truth, Syntactics, Truth value, Truth condition, Reasoning, Logical givens, Mathematical triviality
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Some left-nested indicative conditionals are hard to interpret while others seem fine. Some proponents of the view that indicative conditionals have No Truth Values (NTV) use their view to explain why some left-nestings are hard to interpret: the embedded conditional does not express the truth conditions needed by the embedding conditional. Left-nestings that seem fine are then explained away as cases of ad hoc, pragmatic interpretation. We challenge this explanation. The standard reasons for NTV about indicative conditionals (triviality results, Gibbardian standoffs, etc.) extend naturally to NTV about biconditionals. So NTVers about conditionals should also be NTVers about biconditionals. But biconditionals embed much more freely than conditionals. If NTV explains why some left-nested conditionals are hard to interpret, why do biconditionals embed successfully in the very contexts where conditionals do not embed?
Journal of Philosophical Logic © 2012 Springer