Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Does a Tree-like Phylogeny Only Exist at the Tips in the Prokaryotes?

Christopher J. Creevey, David A. Fitzpatrick, Gayle K. Philip, Rhoda J. Kinsella, Mary J. O'Connell, Melissa M. Pentony, Simon A. Travers, Mark Wilkinson and James O. McInerney
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 271, No. 1557 (Dec. 22, 2004), pp. 2551-2558
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4142914
Page Count: 8
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Does a Tree-like Phylogeny Only Exist at the Tips in the Prokaryotes?
Preview not available

Abstract

The extent to which prokaryotic evolution has been influenced by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and therefore might be more of a network than a tree is unclear. Here we use supertree methods to ask whether a definitive prokaryotic phylogenetic tree exists and whether it can be confidently inferred using orthologous genes. We analysed an 11-taxon dataset spanning the deepest divisions of prokaryotic relationships, a 10-taxon dataset spanning the relatively recent γ-proteobacteria and a 61-taxon dataset spanning both, using species for which complete genomes are available. Congruence among gene trees spanning deep relationships is not better than random. By contrast, a strong, almost perfect phylogenetic signal exists in γ-proteobacterial genes. Deep-level prokaryotic relationships are difficult to infer because of signal erosion, systematic bias, hidden paralogy and/or HGT. Our results do not preclude levels of HGT that would be inconsistent with the notion of a prokaryotic phylogeny. This approach will help decide the extent to which we can say that there is a prokaryotic phylogeny and where in the phylogeny a cohesive genomic signal exists.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
2551
    2551
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2552
    2552
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2553
    2553
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2554
    2554
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2555
    2555
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2556
    2556
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2557
    2557
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2558
    2558