You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Moral and Instrumental Norms in Food Risk Communication
Peter G. Modin and Sven Ove Hansson
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 101, No. 2 (June 2011), pp. 313-324
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41475982
Page Count: 12
Preview not available
The major normative recommendations in the literature on food risk communication can be summarized in the form of seven practical principles for such communication: (1) Be honest and open. (2) Disclose incentives and conflicts of interest. (3) Take all available relevant knowledge into consideration. (4) When possible, quantify risks. (5) Describe and explain uncertainties. (6) Take all the public's concerns into account. (7) Take the rights of individuals and groups seriously. We show that each of these proposed principles can be justified both in terms of more fundamental ethical principles and instrumentally in terms of the communicating agent's selfinterest. The mechanisms of this concordance of justifications are discussed. It is argued that the concordance is specific for areas such as food risks in which agents such as companies and public authorities are highly dependent on the public's trust and confidence. The implications of these findings both for moral philosophy and for practical food risk communication are discussed.
Journal of Business Ethics © 2011 Springer