You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Leadership and Change: The Case for Greater Ethical Clarity
Bernard Burnes and Rune Todnem By
Journal of Business Ethics
Vol. 108, No. 2 (June 2012), pp. 239-252
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476290
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Teleological ethics, Ethical behavior, Consequentialism, Environmental ethics, Corporate responsibility, Business ethics, Political power, Organizational change, Discourse ethics, Deontological ethics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This article addresses the relationship between the ethics underpinning leadership and change. It examines the developments in leadership and change over the last three decades and their ethical implications. It adopts a consequentialist perspective on ethics and uses this to explore different approaches to leadership and change. In particular, the article focuses on individual (egoistic) consequentialism and utilitarian consequentialism. The article argues that all leadership styles and all approaches to change are rooted in a set of values, some of which are more likely to lead to ethical outcomes than others. It also argues that all stakeholders in an organisation have a role to play in ensuring ethical outcomes. It concludes that in order to achieve sustainable and beneficial change, those who promote and adopt particular approaches to leadership and change must provide greater ethical clarity about the approaches they are championing.
Journal of Business Ethics © 2012 Springer