You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Misleading Appearances: Searle on Assertion and Meaning
Vol. 74, No. 1 (January 2011), pp. 115-129
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41476675
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Speech acts, Semantics, Sentences, Linguistic conventions, Sentence structure, Linguistic meaning, Truth, Grasses, Honesty, Linguistics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
John Searle's philosophy of language contains a notorious tension between a literalist view on the relationship between sentences and their meanings, and what—at the first glance—appears to be a virulent defence of contextualism. Appearances notwithstanding, Searle's views on background and meaning are closer to literalism than to contextualism. Searle defines assertion in terms of the commitment to the truth of the propositional content. In absence of an independent criterion to delimit the asserted content, such a definition overgenerates—hence Searle's commitment to literalism. His position is untenable—and this is the general lesson of the paper—, because sentence meaning cannot be used to determine the asserted content.
Erkenntnis (1975-) © 2011 Springer