You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The So-Called Passive of Acehnese
Vol. 64, No. 1 (Mar., 1988), pp. 104-113
Published by: Linguistic Society of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/414788
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The Mon Tasiek dialect of Acehnese (Indonesia) was analysed by Lawler 1977 as having a passive in which the verb agrees with the initial, or underlying, subject. His argument was that the preverbal NP in Acehnese has the expected properties of a surface subject, but that verb agreement was controlled by the underlying subject-which, in 'passive' clauses, is not the preverbal NP. This analysis was based on limited and unrepresentative data. In the light of more extensive data, Lawler's claim that the preverbal NP in Acehnese acts as a final subject does not hold. The most obvious-and, for syntactic theory, the least problematic conclusion-is that the so-called 'underlying' subject is in fact a surface grammatical relation; Acehnese has no passive, and its verbal agreement is a surface phenomenon.
Language © 1988 Linguistic Society of America