You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Symbolic power, robotting, and surveilling
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Vol. 80, No. 1/2, Mathematics Education and Contemporary Theory (May 2012), pp. 119-132
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41485971
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Mathematics, Surveillance, Formal languages, Reality, Symbolism, Humans, Violence, Mathematics education, Scientific revolution, Mathematical logic
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Symbolic power is discussed with reference to mathematics and formal languages.Two distinctions are crucial for establishing mechanical and formal perspectives: one between appearance and reality, and one between sense and reference. These distinctions include a nomination of what to consider primary and secondary. They establish the grammatical format of a mechanical and a formal world view. Such views become imposed on the domains addressed by means of mathematics and formal languages. Through such impositions symbolic power of mathematics becomes exercised. The idea that mathematics describes as it prioritises is discussed with reference to robotting and surveillance. In general, the symbolic power of mathematics and formal languages is summarised through the observations: that mathematics treats parts and properties as autonomous, that it dismembers what it addresses and destroys the organic unity around things, and that it simplifies things and reduces them to a single feature. But, whatever forms the symbolic power may take, it cannot be evaluated along a single good-bad axis.
Educational Studies in Mathematics © 2012 Springer