You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Gender Harassment: Broadening Our Understanding of Sex-Based Harassment at Work
Emily A. Leskinen, Lilia M. Cortina and Dana B. Kabat
Law and Human Behavior
Vol. 35, No. 1 (February 2011), pp. 25-39
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41488970
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Harassment, Sexual harassment, Psychology, Gender discrimination, Social psychology, Coercion, Sexism, Hostility, Working women, Occupational psychology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This study challenges the common legal and organizational practice of privileging sexual advance forms of sex-based harassment, while neglecting gender harassment. Survey data came from women working in two maledominated contexts: the military and the legal profession. Their responses to the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ) revealed five typical profiles of harassment: low victimization, gender harassment, gender harassment with unwanted sexual attention, moderate victimization, and high victimization. The vast majority of harassment victims fell into one of the first two groups, which described virtually no unwanted sexual advances. When compared to non-victims, gender-harassed women showed significant decrements in professional and psychological well-being. These findings underscore the seriousness of gender harassment, which merits greater attention by both law and social science.
Law and Human Behavior © 2011 Springer