Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

A Reply to Rummel

Tomislav Dulić
Journal of Peace Research
Vol. 41, No. 1 (Jan., 2004), pp. 105-106
Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4149659
Page Count: 2
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($40.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available

Abstract

Dulić lists some of the most important points in Rummel's critique. He argues that the objections are misplaced since he is quoting Rummel or using his data. Moreover, Rummel could have shown why he feels that Dulić is wrong by giving his own estimates to be compared with Dulić's extrapolations. Most importantly, Dulić argues that Rummel has avoided the central point of his critique, namely, that of source criticism. Contrary to Rummel, Dulić argues that the case study on Tito's Yugoslavia might well have wider implications, since it focuses on Rummel's method. The methodological problems need to be addressed before Rummel's data and conclusions can be considered reliable. Whether such a revision would yield significantly new results remains undecided.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
105
    105
  • Thumbnail: Page 
106
    106