You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Effects of Macrohabitat and Microhabitat on Nest-Box Use and Nesting Success of American Kestrels
Ronald W. Rohrbaugh, Jr. and Richard H. Yahner
The Wilson Bulletin
Vol. 109, No. 3 (Sep., 1997), pp. 410-423
Published by: Wilson Ornithological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4163837
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Animal nesting, Bird nesting, Birds of prey, Starlings, Breeding, Microhabitats, Nesting tables, Incubation, Nesting sites, Wildlife habitats
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We studied the nesting ecology of American Kestrels (Falco sparverius) in Berks and Lehigh Counties, Pennsylvania, from 1987-1991. Kestrels used 99 (76%) of 130 nest boxes dispersed throughout a 1000-km2 study area. A total of 259 nesting attempts was noted: 67, 53, 49, 35, and 55 in 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, and 1991, respectively. Of the 259 nesting attempts, 124 (49%) successfully fledged at least one offspring. We measured five macrohabitat and 14 microhabitat variables at the 130 nest boxes. Ten (53%) variables were correlated to levels of nest-box use and nesting success. Kestrels most frequently used nest boxes with high nestling-light intensity (P = 0.02) and low nest-box concealment (P = 0.05). Frequently used boxes were associated with extremely open habitat dominated by herbaceous vegetation (P < 0.005). Nesting kestrels avoided using boxes associated with dense habitats, such as late-successional old fields. Frequently used nest boxes were farther from forested areas than unused boxes (P = 0.05). Nest boxes with southeast orientations were used more frequently than expected (P < 0.025), and all other orientations were used in proportion to availability. Kestrels had the greatest nesting success when using nest boxes with high selection-light intensities (P = 0.05).
The Wilson Bulletin © 1997 Wilson Ornithological Society