You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Temporal Patterns in the Diet and Food Partitioning in Imperial Cormorants (Phalacrocorax atriceps) and Rock Shags (P. Magellanicus) Breeding at Bahía Bustamante, Argentina
Gabriel Punta, Pablo Yorio and Gonzalo Herrera
The Wilson Bulletin
Vol. 115, No. 3 (Sep., 2003), pp. 307-315
Published by: Wilson Ornithological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4164575
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Fish, Breeding, Sea birds, Diet, Foraging, Crustaceans, Food, Colonies, Species, Cephalopods
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We studied the diet of Imperial Cormorants (Phalacrocorax atriceps) and Rock Shags (P. magellanicus) at Bahía Bustamante, Argentina, between 1992 and 1994. We analyzed pellet casts (1887 from Imperial Cormorants and 799 from Rock Shags) and regurgitations of stomach contents (260 from Imperial Cormorants and 24 from Rock Shags). Imperial Cormorants and Rock Shags fed on at least 22 and 21 different types of prey, respectively. The main prey species during all study years were fish: Engraulis anchoita for Imperial Cormorants and Patagonothen sp. for Rock Shags. For both species, the consumption of the main food categories as estimated by pellet analysis was similar among years. A significant relationship was found between Imperial Cormorant and Rock Shag diets during the three years, while the diet overlap index was relatively high. During all years, Imperial Cormorants consumed a significantly larger proportion of pelagic or demersal fish than did Rock Shags, while Rock Shags consumed benthic fish in a greater proportion than did Imperial Cormorants. Mean maximum diving depth, determined using capillary tube depth gauges, of Imperial Cormorants (24.4 m ± 18.8 SD) was significantly greater but more variable than that of Rock Shags (9.3 m ± 4.1 SD).
The Wilson Bulletin © 2003 Wilson Ornithological Society