Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Evidence for Topographic Control of Tree Spatial Patterning in an Old-growth, Mixed Mesophytic Forest in Southeastern Ohio, USA

Stephen J. Murphy and Brian C. McCarthy
The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society
Vol. 139, No. 2 (APRIL-JUNE 2012), pp. 181-193
Published by: Torrey Botanical Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41678792
Page Count: 13
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($10.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Evidence for Topographic Control of Tree Spatial Patterning in an Old-growth, Mixed Mesophytic Forest in Southeastern Ohio, USA
Preview not available

Abstract

Analyzing the spatial pattern of individuals within a plant community is useful for inferring the underlying mechanisms and processes governing community organization. Aggregated patterns can be caused by habitat-specificity or dispersal limitation, while overdispersed patterns are often caused by competition or predatory hostspecificity. However, few studies have looked at how abiotic influences might drive spatial patterning. Here, we address how topography might lead to differences in tree spatial patterning on a north-and south-facing slope at Dysart Woods. We also look at how species identity, canopy position, and sampling year affect spatial patterning. We found that the spatial distribution of trees was highly aggregated on a south-facing plot, but did not differ from random on a north-facing plot. We attribute these differences largely to the differential dominance of Acer saccharum and Fagus grandifolia on the north and south plots, respectively. Acer saccharum individuals were largely randomly distributed, while Fagus grandifolia individuals were highly aggregated. We also found differences between understory and overstory individuals, with smaller individuals being more aggregated, likely due to life-history or competitive self-thinning processes. Lastly, we observed a surprising change in the scale that aggregation occurred at from 1996 to 2011 on the south plot. In 1996, stems on the south plot were aggregated at distances > 3 meters, but only at distances > 10 meters in 2011. We found that this reduction in aggregation was largely due to the unusually high mortality rates of Cornus florida and Prunus serotina. We conclude that topography can greatly influence spatial patterning, and that this and other abiotic variables should be taken into consideration in future studies on community structure.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
181
    181
  • Thumbnail: Page 
182
    182
  • Thumbnail: Page 
183
    183
  • Thumbnail: Page 
184
    184
  • Thumbnail: Page 
185
    185
  • Thumbnail: Page 
186
    186
  • Thumbnail: Page 
187
    187
  • Thumbnail: Page 
188
    188
  • Thumbnail: Page 
189
    189
  • Thumbnail: Page 
190
    190
  • Thumbnail: Page 
191
    191
  • Thumbnail: Page 
192
    192
  • Thumbnail: Page 
193
    193