You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Competing mechanisms and scaling laws for carbon nanotube scission by ultrasonication
Guido Pagani, Micah J. Green, Philippe Poulin and Matteo Pasquali
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 109, No. 29 (July 17, 2012), pp. 11599-11604
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41685122
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Bubbles, Buckling, Carbon nanotubes, Polymers, Rock cleavage, Strain rate, Buckles, Power laws, Liquids, Simulations
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Dispersion of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) into liquids typically requires ultrasonication to exfoliate individuals CNTs from bundles. Experiments show that CNT length drops with sonication time (or energy) as a power law t⁻m. Yet the breakage mechanism is not well understood, and the experimentally reported power law exponent m ranges from approximately 0.2 to 0.5. Here we simulate the motion of CNTs around cavitating bubbles by coupling Brownian dynamics with the Rayleigh-Plesset equation. We observe that, during bubble growth, CNTs align tangentially to the bubble surface. Surprisingly, we find two dynamical regimes during the collapse: shorter CNTs align radially, longer ones buckle. We compute the phase diagram for CNT collapse dynamics as a function of CNT length, stiffness, and initial distance from the bubble nuclei and determine the transition from aligning to buckling. We conclude that, depending on their length, CNTs can break due to either buckling or stretching. These two mechanisms yield different power laws for the length decay (0.25 and 0.5, respectively), reconciling the apparent discrepancy in the experimental data.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 2012 National Academy of Sciences