You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985-2000
David S. Saal, David Parker and Tom Weyman-Jones
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Vol. 28, No. 1/2, Special issue on Applications and Application-Motivated Developments in Productivity Analysis (October, 2007), pp. 127-139
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41770331
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Industrial efficiency, Productivity growth, Water quality, Industrial regulation, Water use efficiency, Water supply, Distance functions, Industrial productivity, Productivity, Privatization
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The water and sewerage industry of England and Wales was privatized in 1989 and subjected to a new regime of environmental, water quality and RPI+K price cap regulation. This paper estimates a quality-adjusted input distance function, with stochastic frontier techniques in order to estimate productivity growth rates for the period 1985-2000. Productivity is decomposed so as to account for the impact of technical change, efficiency change, and scale change. Compared with earlier studies by Saal and Parker [(2000) Managerial Decision Econ 21(6): 253-268, (2001) J Regul Econ 20(1): 61-90], these estimates allow a more careful consideration of how and whether privatization and the new regulatory regime affected productivity growth in the industry. Strikingly, they suggest that while technical change improved after privatization, productivity growth did not improve, and this was attributable to efficiency losses as firms appear to have struggled to keep up with technical advances after privatization. Moreover, the results also suggest that the excessive scale of the WaSCs contributed negatively to productivity growth.
Journal of Productivity Analysis © 2007 Springer