You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Estimating Radial Measures of Productivity Growth: Frontier vs Non-Frontier Approaches
SCOTT E. ATKINSON and CHRISTOPHER CORNWELL
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Vol. 10, No. 1, Special Issue: Selected Papers from the Fourth European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis held at the Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, October 1995 (July 1998), pp. 35-46
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41770859
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Productivity, Railway systems, Cost efficiency, Productive efficiency, Cost estimates, Productivity growth, Cost functions, Cost estimation models, Distance functions, Rail industry
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
In this paper, we propose an alternative econometric framework for estimating and decomposing productivity change that does not require a distribution for inefficiency or the uncorrelatedness between inefficiency and the regressors. We develop our methodology for the input-oriented radial measure of productivity change and establish that this equals the negative of the time change in the log cost function. Our econometric framework is based on a fixed-effects, multiple-output cost frontier, where we decompose productivity change into discrete shifts in the frontier and changes in firm efficiency levels relative to the frontier. We also show that the standard non-frontier specification is nested within our frontier model and thus can produce different estimates of productivity change. Using a panel of twelve US railroads from 1951 to 1975, our estimated cost frontier suggests average annual productivity growth of roughly 0.3 percent, with efficiency change rising then falling over the period. Specification tests reject the non-frontier model, which yields smaller gains in productivity.
Journal of Productivity Analysis © 1998 Springer