You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
WHICH HOUSEHOLDS OWN MUNICIPAL BONDS? EVIDENCE FROM TAX RETURNS
DANIEL R. FEENBERG and JAMES M. POTERBA
National Tax Journal
Vol. 44, No. 4, Part 1: PROCEEDINGS OF A CONFERENCE ON THE TAX-EXEMPT BOND MARKET (December, 1991), pp. 93-103
Published by: National Tax Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41788925
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Marginal tax rate, Taxes, Municipal bonds, Interest, Tax exempt bonds, Personal debt, Tax rates, Income taxes, Tax returns, Taxpaying
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This paper uses data from 1988 federal income tax returns, which asked taxpayers to report their tax-exempt interest income as an information item, to analyze the distribution of tax-exempt asset holdings. More than three quarters of the tax-exempt debt held by households was held by those with marginal tax rates of 28 percent or more. The paper reports two measures of the average marginal tax rate on tax-exempt debt. The first measures the increase in taxes if a small fraction of each taxpayer's exempt interest income were converted to taxable interest. This weighted average of "firstdollar" marginal tax rates was 25.8 percent. A second calculation finds that if all tax-exempt interest were reported as taxable interest, taxes would rise by 27.6 percent of the increase in taxable interest. Many taxpayers who have substantial taxexempt interest receipts, but low first-dollar marginal tax rates, would be driven into higher tax brackets if the exemption were eliminated but their portfolios emained the same.
National Tax Journal © 1991 National Tax Association