You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Approaches to Value Research and Value Measurement
Vol. 28, No. 4 (1985), pp. 349-358
Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4194586
Page Count: 10
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Empirical value research is currently enjoying a renaissance. Attempts to survey people's values have proliferated since the 1970s, and their theoretical weight has increased; the concept of social values has acquired new prominence in the social sciences. For example, in his most recent works Jürgen Habermas draws extensively on empirical research into values. It is my intention in this article to criticize Ronald Inglehart's empirical theory of what he calls a value revolution, and to assess the usefulness of this theory in social scientific analysis. I shall then compare Inglehart with the line of empirical value research originally developed by Milton Rokeach. Finally, there is a brief introduction to a study of the value systems of Finnish people that was based on Rokeach's model.
Acta Sociologica © 1985 Sage Publications, Ltd.