You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Trade Liberalisation in a Heckscher–Ohlin Model: Does Public Skill Formation Change the Conventional Results?
Indian Economic Review
New Series, Vol. 47, No. 1 (January - June 2012), pp. 1-13
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41969715
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Standard trade theory suggests that trade liberalisation produces opposite effects on human capital accumulation in developed and developing countries, reducing the incentives to invest in education in skill-scarce countries. Would conventional wisdom be modified if we introduce public provision of education in the standard framework? This paper shows that when skill formation depends on public provision, trade liberalisation effects on human capital accumulation depends on the education technology relative to the economic structure. In contrast to the previous literature, this framework explains skills convergence or divergence in a standard framework; thus, it may help to improve its predictive power.
Indian Economic Review © 2012 Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi