You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Should Public Discussion of Political Science Research Be Controlled? Why Interest Group Recommendations on the Proper Procedures for Reporting Research Should Be Treated with Skepticism
Jay P. Greene and Paul E. Peterson
PS: Political Science and Politics
Vol. 33, No. 2 (Jun., 2000), pp. 220-224
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/420896
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Peer review, Political science, Educational research, Vouchers, School choice, Political interest groups, Meetings, Social sciences, Plant spines, Education policy
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
PS: Political Science and Politics © 2000 American Political Science Association