You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
"The Handmaid's Tale": "Historical Notes" and Documentary Subversion
Dominick M. Grace
Science Fiction Studies
Vol. 25, No. 3 (Nov., 1998), pp. 481-494
Published by: SF-TH Inc
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4240726
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Tales, Novels, Narratives, Science fiction, Narrative history, Sexism, Dystopian fiction, Literary criticism, Literary devices, History instruction
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The "Historical Notes" appearing at the end of Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" have been the subject of repeated critical scrutiny. Commentaries have suggested that the world of 2195 is far from an eutopian alternative to the dystopia of Gilead; indeed, commentators consistently note the sexism of Pieixoto and suggest that the conditions that led to the founding of Gilead in the first place still exist in the world of 2195. The world of 2195 is one in which women once again assume positions of authority and in which Native North American peoples are evidently part of the dominant culture. It might appear, therefore, an eutopian alternative to Gilead, and perhaps even to the world of today, if we can accept at face value that the sexist and racist assumptions prevalent in Gilead (and today) have been eradicated; but we cannot. Instead, we are forced by the inconsistencies and disjunctions created by Pieixoto's deeply flawed analysis of Offred's account to question the documentary method itself as a valid arbiter of truth.
Science Fiction Studies © 1998 SF-TH Inc