You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Het Toren van Babel-schilderij in het Mauritshuis. Een illustratie van de relatie tussen de 15de-eeuwse miniatuur- en schilderkunst in de Nederlanden
Vol. 108, No. 3 (1994), pp. 109-119
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42711465
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In the Mauritshuis at The Hague is the earliest extant painting on the theme of the Tower of Babel (fig. 1). The panel's small size (19.7 × 17 cm) and the minute detail of the narrative scene suggest a relationship with the art of the miniature. This connection, which is demonstrable in other early representations of the theme (figs. 2-3), is confirmed by numerous motivic similarities with a number of miniatures (figs. 4-6) in Les anciennes croniques et conquestes de Charlemaine, a manuscript which was illuminated by Jan de Tavernier between 1458 and c. 1465 and shortly afterwards showed up in the library of Philip, Duke of Burgundy. It is now in the Albert 1 Royal Library in Brussels. The anonymous painter of the panel was probably not in a position to base his work directly on the actual miniatures, but he may well have made use of sketches which served for the illumination of manuscripts in De Tavernier's studio. However, it cannot be ruled out that a Tower of Babel was painted in that studio. Neither the obvious relationship with De Tavernier's oeuvre nor corresponding motifs in paintings from the Bruges (fig. 8) and Haarlem (fig. 9) environments yield a logical hypothesis for an attribution of the panel in The Hague. The article does however draw attention to the important but hitherto insufficiently examined relationship between 15th-century painting and the contemporary miniature (and other art techniques).
Oud Holland © 1994 Brill