You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A RESPONSE TO R.J. ROBINSON'S, 'THE "CIVILIZING PROCESS": SOME REMARKS ON ELIAS'S SOCIAL HISTORY'
Vol. 23, No. 2 (May 1989), pp. 299-307
Published by: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42853927
Page Count: 9
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
R.J. Robinson (1987) argues that the crux of Elias's theory of the 'civilizing process' lies in its status as historiography and claims to have shown that 'all Elias's main claims about social history are demonstrably false.' Accordingly, he argues, 'the theory of the civilizing process seems very largely destroyed.' Close reading of Robinson, however, suggests that he has misinterpreted Elias in significant ways and that a more accurate reading of Elias's texts will be necessary before his theory can be properly evaluated.
Sociology © 1989 Sage Publications, Ltd.