You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Review: Class, Politics and Historical 'Revisionism'
Reviewed Works: Liberty, Retrenchment and Reform: Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, 1860-1880 by Eugenio F. Biagini; Currents of Radicalism: Popular Radicalism, Organized Labour and Party Politics in Britain, 1850-1914 by Eugenio F. Biagini, Alastair J. Reid
Review by: Robert Gray
Vol. 19, No. 2 (May, 1994), pp. 209-220
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4286197
Page Count: 12
Preview not available
Note: This article is a review of another work, such as a book, film, musical composition, etc. The original work is not included in the purchase of this review.
This article responds to recent work on class and popular politics in Britain, especially that of Eugenio Biagini and Alastair Reid (Biagini, "Liberty, Retrenchment and Reform" (1992); Biagini and Reid (eds), "Currents of Radicalism" (1991)). The work considered here offers revisions of the social history of class. Popular dimensions in Gladstonian Liberalism, as well as cross-currents in popular opinion too readily dismissed in teleological narratives of class, are rightly emphasised. However, it is suggested that more attention could be paid to tensions within liberalism, and to gender, as well as class dimensions. Emphasis on formal political language (defined in party-political terms by the last decades of the nineteenth century) is arguably in tension with the exploration of broader popular mentalities, addressed especially by some of the contributors to the edited volume, as well as by much cognate work in social history. The established agendas of social history are of continuing relevance in this respect, as is the 'new' emphasis on language and identities.
Social History © 1994 Taylor & Francis, Ltd.