You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Preview not available
In this brief reply to Fraser MacBride's critical examination of the four-category ontology and the place within it of the particular – universal distinction, it is argued that the prospects for identifying the four basic ontological categories in terms of the characteristic patterns of ontological dependency between entities belonging to the different categories are rather more promising than MacBride suggests.
Dialectica © 2004 Wiley