You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Application of the Log-Hyperbolic Distribution to Hawai'ian Beach Sands
Ross A. Sutherland and Cheing-Tung Lee
Journal of Coastal Research
Vol. 10, No. 2 (Spring, 1994), pp. 251-262
Published by: Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4298213
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Statistical parameters of the log-normal distribution have been widely used in the textural analysis of particle size data. Graphical or moment measures have traditionally been used to discriminate between environments and for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. However, recent work has indicated that the log-hyperbolic probability density function may be more appropriate for quantifying observed mass frequency data of sediments. The objective of this study is to assess the applicability of the log-hyperbolic distribution for characterizing Hawai'ian carbonate beach sands, and to test whether this model can discriminate between beach subenvironments. A grid- based design was used to sample the upper sedimentation unit at 126 locations on Waimanalo Beach, Oahu, Hawai'i. The log-hyperbolic distribution fit 70% of the sand samples. Exploratory data analysis indicated that the beach had a complex textural pattern. Therefore, the beach was divided into a backshore zone, and the foreshore was divided into three separate zones, the lower, middle, and upper foreshore. Size and sorting parameters of the log-hyperbolic distribution indicated little significant difference between the upper foreshore and backshore sediments. Typical gain size (v) was coarsest in the lower foreshore (0.43 mm) and finest in the mid-foreshore (0.23 mm). Upper foreshore and backshore sediments were the best sorted (i.e., the highest values of δ, ζ, and k), while the lower and middle foreshore zones were the most poorly sorted. The distribution shape (asymmetry) parameter π indicated that all four subenvironments were significantly different, with a median value of -0.45 for the lower foreshore, and a negative skewness (x) of -0.13. These values indicate a dominant coarse population and a subordinate fine population. A hydrodynamic hypothesis is presented to explain the complex spatial pattern of beach sediments. This involves energy dissipation and traction load deposition in the lower foreshore, and subsequent shoreward transport of finer particles in the less competent swash. Infiltration into the beach sediments produces a shoreward fining sequence that is subsequently modified by selective aeolian transport.
Journal of Coastal Research © 1994 Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.