You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
F.D.R., the ALA, and Mr. MacLEISH: The Selection of the Librarian of Congress, 1939
The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy
Vol. 42, No. 4 (Oct., 1972), pp. 390-398
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4306204
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Library associations, Libraries, Librarians, Political campaigns, Retirement, Political protests, Specialized committees, Telegrams, United States Senate, Political candidates
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The retirement of Herbert Putnam in 1938 set the stage for a campaign by the American Library Association to influence the selection of his replacement. The effort was carried on while an ALA committee was engaged in trying to obtain the nomination of its secretary, Carl H. Milam. At no time did either the ALA or Milam admit that he was a candidate, although the efforts were very strenuous in his behalf. Failing to obtain a hearing with President Roosevelt, other efforts were made to affect indirectly the selection process. None of these methods were successful, and when Archibald MacLeish was nominated the announcement was heaped with scorn. The poet's lack of administrative experience and library training were the chief causes of complaint, although others outside the profession centered their attack on his "subversive" background. All efforts failed, and the U.S. Senate confirmed the nomination. The episode was a stunning and embarrassing defeat for the association.
The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy © 1972 The University of Chicago Press