Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

State Appellate Judges' Attitudes toward Court Reform: Results of a National Survey

John M. Scheb, II
State & Local Government Review
Vol. 22, No. 1 (Winter, 1990), pp. 17-21
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4354972
Page Count: 5
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($40.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
State Appellate Judges' Attitudes toward Court Reform: Results of a National Survey
Preview not available

Abstract

This article reports the results of a national survey of state appellate judges' attitudes toward court reform issues. Strong support is found for the Missouri Plan for judicial selection, for the abolition of nonlawyer judges, for continuing judicial education, and for professionalized court administration. Less support is found for consolidation of multiple, specialized tribunals into courts of general jurisdiction. Overall, respondents provide a positive assessment of their respective state court systems. Court financing is identified as the problem most urgently in need of attention, with judicial selection, court management, and structural reform also eliciting significant levels of concern.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
17
    17
  • Thumbnail: Page 
18
    18
  • Thumbnail: Page 
19
    19
  • Thumbnail: Page 
20
    20
  • Thumbnail: Page 
21
    21