You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Changing from Multimember to Single-Member Districts: Partisan, Racial, and Gender Consequences
Charles S. Bullock, III and Ronald Keith Gaddie
State & Local Government Review
Vol. 25, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), pp. 155-163
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4355069
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Multimember districts, Hispanics, Political partisanship, Redistricting, Political parties, African Americans, Upper houses, Legislators, United States Senate
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The impact of change from multimember districts to single-member districts following the 1980 census is examined in five state legislative bodies. Unlike research which has reported net changes statewide, this article examines changes in election results as previously multimember districts became single-member districts. The transformation generally benefited minorities and Republicans, with both groups often gaining in the same (formerly multimember) district. The change less often resulted in additional female legislators. Delegations tended to become somewhat more bipartisan after adoption of single-member districts.
State & Local Government Review © 1993 Sage Publications, Inc.