You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Perceptions of Performance Measurement and the Practice of Performance Reporting by Small Cities
State & Local Government Review
Vol. 35, No. 3 (Autumn, 2003), pp. 161-173
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4355347
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Performance metrics, Cities, Finance, City halls, Mayors, Municipal governments, Local government, Government budgets, City politics, City councils
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
After decades of promotion of performance measurement in municipal governments, there is still limited understanding about how small city governments perceive the tool and report performance measurement results. Using an innovation diffusion framework and two surveys of Iowa city officials, this article shows that many mayors and finance officials in small cities are familiar with performance measurement and perceive it to have some usefulness. Also, data availability is not a significant barrier to performance measurement and reporting. However, electoral politics and staff workload remain major concerns. The survey results also show that mayors have a significant influence on the decision to implement performance reporting. On the basis of these findings, the author recommends promoting performance measurement and reporting in municipal governments.
State & Local Government Review © 2003 Sage Publications, Inc.