You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Electoral College and Conflict in American History and Politics
Philip R. Schmidt
Vol. 4, No. 3, Special Issue: Conflict (September 2002), pp. 195-208
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43735851
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Electoral college, Voting, Presidential elections, Political elections, United States history, Voter fraud, Political conflict, Political history, Plurality voting, Political candidates
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The historical relationship between the electoral college and controversial U.S. presidential elections, specifically with respect to conflict, is examined. The elections of 1800, 1824, 1860, 1876, 1888, 1968, and 2000 are examined. Aside from the 2000 election, there has been essentially no conflict in American history due to the electoral college. The constitutional structure and thinking behind the form of the electoral college is given, with emphasis on the federal aspects of the structure. The current movement to abolish the electoral college in favor of direct popular vote is depicted, along with the arguments against making that change. The conclusion is that we as a nation are far better off to retain the status quo than to make the called-for change.
Sociological Practice © 2002 Sage Publications, Inc.