You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
How Stable Is Indian Irrigated Agriculture?
B. D. Dhawan
Economic and Political Weekly
Vol. 22, No. 39 (Sep. 26, 1987), pp. A93+A95-A96
Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4377540
Page Count: 3
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Instability of irrigated farming during the period 1970-71 to 1983-84 is here assessed and compared with the corresponding instability in rainfed farming. That irrigation lowers farm instability is found in nine out of eleven states. For all the eleven states taken together, the coefficient of variation of detrended output is 5.4 per cent for the irrigated segment as against 11.4 per cent for the unirrigated segment. Quite expectedly, the stability gain in yield due to irrigation is much more than the corresponding stability gain in crop area. It is in the two high rainfall states of Bihar and Madhya Pradesh that irrigation fails to show any moderating influence on agricultural instability.
Economic and Political Weekly © 1987 Economic and Political Weekly