You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Foreign Collaboration in Indian Industry
V. N. Balasubramanyam
Economic and Political Weekly
Vol. 6, No. 48 (Nov. 27, 1971), pp. M159+M161+M163+M165-M166
Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4382803
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Technology, Imports, Financial investments, Foreign investments, International economics, Economic capital, Economic research, Exports, Reserve banking, Royalty
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
What has been the impact of imported technology and investment on Indian industrial productivity, exports and growth? As the Reserve Bank of India study on the subject puts it, "the major problem in this field is, for instance, whether, on balance, foreign collaboration arrangements have resulted in, or can be relied on to result in, a net gain to the country? Have those firms and industries which have relied more on technology fared better relative to the others in terms of productivity and growth?" Central to the same theme are questions such as what exactly is the nature of knowledge imported under the technical collaboration agreements? Is the knowledge imported suited to Indian conditions and prevailing factor proportions? Has the implementation of foreign techniques resulted in a higher capital-labour ratio? Is the imported knowledge restructured to suit Indian factor and product market conditions? What has been the cost of such restructuring? How best to assess the quality of knowledge imported? Is the market for knowledge a perfect one? If not, what are the costs and benefits of operating in an imperfect market for knowledge? Questions such as these are easily raised, but answers are hard to find, mainly because of the lack of reliable and comprehensive factual and statistical data on the subject. A benefit-cost analysis of foreign technology requires much more comprehensive information than is available from published sources. A sector-by-sector analysis of the problems or even micro case studies of selected individual firms with foreign collaboration in each of the industrial sectors would be a more fruitful avenue of approach than overall macro studies. [The author wishes to thank A I MacBean and R Whittaker for comments on this paper.]
Economic and Political Weekly © 1971 Economic and Political Weekly