You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Germaneness Rules and Bicameral Relations in the U. S. Congress
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Vol. 7, No. 3 (Aug., 1982), pp. 341-357
Published by: Washington University
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/439362
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Upper houses, United States Senate, Voting, Congressional voting, Political debate, Senators, Legislation, United States House of Representatives, Silver, Libraries
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The legislative procedures of the U.S. House and Senate differ in a number of fundamental respects, and procedural conflicts may arise in the process of resolving policy differences. One important difference between the two chambers concerns the germaneness of amendments. House rules require that all floor amendments be germane; Senate rules impose no such requirement under most circumstances. Consequently, conference agreements may include provisions that violate a basic principle of House procedure. The House changed its rules during the 1970s to address this problem and sought accommodation rather than confrontation, attempting to isolate conflicts with the Senate and cope with them by means that protected the integrity of House proceedings.
Legislative Studies Quarterly © 1982 Washington University