You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Are Prices Higher for the Poor? Price Heterogeneity and 'Real' Inequality in Rural Karnataka
Vijayendra Rao and A. C. Komala
Economic and Political Weekly
Vol. 32, No. 48 (Nov. 29 - Dec. 5, 1997), pp. 3073-3079
Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4406128
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Prices, Market prices, Oil prices, Open markets, Rice, Nominal prices, Households, Retail stores, Real income, Import prices
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This paper, based upon a case-study of three villages in Karnataka, uses qualitative and quantitative data to study whether households within the same market pay different prices for identical goods. It is found that not only are unit prices for food heterogeneous, but that the poor pay more for the same goods than the rich. This is because liquidity constraints force poorer households to purchase goods in small quantities and consequently subject them to quantity premiums. Quantity effects are directly estimated by OLS and IV for prices, and are found to be particularly acute for dals. Household specific index numbers are calculated to measure this price heterogeneity and are used to adjust nominal incomes to real values. It is found that Gini coefficients of real incomes are between 12 per cent and 23 per cent greater than those for nominal incomes depending upon the price index used. An econometric analysis of the determinants of prices shows that incomes are negatively correlated with prices, as is family size, but that the amount of land owned shows a positive relationship. All of these effects are consistent with a quantity premium explanation.
Economic and Political Weekly © 1997 Economic and Political Weekly