Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Right to Constitutional Remedy: Significance of Article 32

Nirmalendu Bikash Rakshit
Economic and Political Weekly
Vol. 34, No. 34/35 (Aug. 21 - Sep. 3, 1999), pp. 2379-2381
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4408327
Page Count: 3
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($9.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Right to Constitutional Remedy: Significance of Article 32
Preview not available

Abstract

A mere enumeration of rights, even if it is meticulously worded is not enough. What is needed is a provision for its enforcement, an avenue for redressal. Article 32 of the Indian Constitution enshrines this provision whereby individuals may seek redressal for the violation of their fundamental rights.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
2379
    2379
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2380
    2380
  • Thumbnail: Page 
2381
    2381