You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Strained Mercy: Quality of Medical Care in Delhi
Jishnu Das and Jeffrey Hammer
Economic and Political Weekly
Vol. 39, No. 9 (Feb. 28 - Mar. 5, 2004), pp. 951-961
Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4414707
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Medical practice, Private sector, Diseases, Diarrhea, Public sector, Fever, Patient care, Antibiotics, Pharyngitis, Hammers
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The quality of medical care is a potentially important determinant of health outcomes, but remains an understudied area. The limited research that exists defines quality either on the basis of drug availability or facility characteristics, but little is known about how provider quality affects the provision of health care. We address this gap through a survey in Delhi with two related components. We evaluate 'competence' (what providers know) through vignettes and practice (what providers do) through direct clinical observation. Overall quality, as measured by the competence necessary to recognise and handle common and dangerous conditions, is quite low albeit with tremendous variation. While there is some correlation with simple observed characteristics, there is still an enormous amount of variation within such categories. Further, even when providers know what to do they often don't do it in practice. This appears to be true in both the public and private sectors but for very different, and systematic, reasons. The study has important policy implications for our understanding of how market failures and failures of regulation in the health sector affect the poor.
Economic and Political Weekly © 2004 Economic and Political Weekly