You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Public Investment and Poverty Reduction: Lessons from China and India
Sukhadeo Thorat and Shenggen Fan
Economic and Political Weekly
Vol. 42, No. 8 (Feb. 24 - Mar. 2, 2007), pp. 704-710
Published by: Economic and Political Weekly
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4419287
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Public investments, Poverty, Financial investments, Government spending, Agricultural productivity, Rural poverty, Farm economics, Employment, Crops, Economic growth models
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Growth in agricultural productivity, the rural non-farm sector and rural wages, which are the main sources of poverty reduction in both China and India, have been made possible by public investments in R&D, infrastructure (such as roads, power, irrigation, communication and education) and anti-poverty programmes. However, returns on these public investments, reckoned in terms of poverty reduction, vary drastically across different types of investment. The trade-off between agricultural growth and poverty reduction is generally small among different types of investments and between regions. Agricultural research, education, and infrastructure development have a significant growth impact as well as a large poverty reduction impact.
Economic and Political Weekly © 2007 Economic and Political Weekly