You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Do Guidelines for Community-Acquired Pneumonia Improve the Cost-Effectiveness of Hospital Care?
Dilip Nathwani, Ethan Rubinstein, Gavin Barlow and Peter Davey
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Vol. 32, No. 5 (Mar. 1, 2001), pp. 728-741
Published by: Oxford University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4461452
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Pneumonia, Health outcomes, Antibiotics, Hospital admissions, Physicians, Mortality, Medical practice, Blood, Hospital costs, Infections
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
There is growing pressure to demonstrate the value of practice guidelines. We have reviewed the evidence that guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) change current practices and that the standardization of practices reduces costs and/or improves outcome. The most obvious barrier to implementation of the guidelines is lack of knowledge about their content; equally important are the attitudes and behavior of professionals, patients, and their caregivers. Guidelines may improve the outcome of CAP, provided that there is an association between variations in outcome and some specific processes of care. Conversely, when there is no such relationship, guidelines may reduce the cost of care without having an adverse effect on outcome. The cost-effectiveness of CAP guidelines in an individual hospital depends on the systems that are available to identify patients with CAP and to measure the processes of care. There is good evidence that following the recommendations of the CAP guidelines does improve the cost-effectiveness of care and, therefore, that an audit of CAP may be worth the effort.
Clinical Infectious Diseases © 2001 Oxford University Press