You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Partisan Differences on Environmental Issues: A Congressional Roll-Call Analysis
Riley E. Dunlap and Michael Patrick Allen
The Western Political Quarterly
Vol. 29, No. 3 (Sep., 1976), pp. 384-397
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/447511
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Recent studies have challenged the assumption that environmental quality is a non-partisan issue. Evidence from three state legislatures indicates the existence of significant partisan differences, with Democrats being more "pro-environment" than Republicans. We report similar results at the congressional level. First, available literature suggests that there were significant differences between the parties prior to the rise of "Ecology" as a national issue (Democrats more "pro-environmental"). Second, roll-call analysis of environmental measures in the House (92nd Congress) indicates that Democrats rank significantly higher in "pro-environment" voting than Republicans. The relationship between party and pro-environment voting persists after the possibly confounding effects of constituency influence and personal characteristics of representatives are controlled for via partial correlation. Further, pro-environment voting is highly correlated with indicators of liberal-conservative voting (liberals significantly more pro-environment).
The Western Political Quarterly © 1976 University of Utah