Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

The Role of Risk in a Tax-Arbitrage Pension Portfolio

Richard A. Ippolito
Financial Analysts Journal
Vol. 46, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 1990), pp. 24-32
Published by: CFA Institute
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4479293
Page Count: 9
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Role of Risk in a Tax-Arbitrage Pension Portfolio
Preview not available

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that, prior to the 1986 Tax Reform Act, the optimal strategy for tax-paying investors was to hold bonds in their pension fund and stock outside the fund. Given pension funding rules, however, it is likely that a better strategy would have been to employ some combination of risky assets and bonds. This is because risky assets expand the tax-exempt base beyond the full-funding limits defined in the Internal Revenue Code. A steady-state pension plan with either a balanced portfolio of bonds and stock or an all-stock portfolio would have generated tax benefits only about two-thirds as high as the tax benefits to an all-bond alternative prior to 1986. But a dynamic strategy that called for an all-stock portfolio until substantial funding was achieved, followed by a switch to an all-bond portfolio, would have far outstripped the tax gains from a static all-bond portfolio. The incentive to hold bonds in pension portfolios was substantially reduced by the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Elimination of the special capital gains tax substantially reduced the previous inequality between pre-personal-tax bond and equity returns. The new legislation left unaffected, however, the trust-expanding benefits of risky assets. Asset allocation strategies calling for substantial stockholdings thus become optimal under current tax laws.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
24
    24
  • Thumbnail: Page 
25
    25
  • Thumbnail: Page 
26
    26
  • Thumbnail: Page 
27
    27
  • Thumbnail: Page 
28
    28
  • Thumbnail: Page 
29
    29
  • Thumbnail: Page 
30
    30
  • Thumbnail: Page 
31
    31
  • Thumbnail: Page 
32
    32