You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Where Are the Gains from International Diversification?
Rex A. Sinquefield
Financial Analysts Journal
Vol. 52, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 1996), pp. 8-14
Published by: CFA Institute
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4479891
Page Count: 7
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
EAFE and international marketlike mandates are popular with U.S. institutional fund sponsors. The rationale seems to be that the international equity market has higher expected returns than the U.S. equity market and can substantially diversify U.S. portfolios. The empirical evidence for the 1970-94 period does not support either claim. Nor does theory help. Asset pricing models do not argue that risk factors have geographically different expected returns. Recent research for the U.S. market shows that two risk factors, value and size, explain differences in expected returns across equity portfolios. Preliminary evidence suggests that the same factors work in foreign markets, as well. International value stocks and international small stocks diversify U.S. portfolios more than EAFE. In fact, a sensible reason to diversify internationally is to "load up" on value stocks and small stocks without concentrating in one geographic region. If one does not wish to concentrate in such stocks, then international diversification for U.S. sponsors may be unnecessary.
Financial Analysts Journal © 1996 CFA Institute