You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination: The Role of the Solicitor General
Jeffrey A. Segal and Cheryl D. Reedy
The Western Political Quarterly
Vol. 41, No. 3 (Sep., 1988), pp. 553-568
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/448602
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Solicitors general, Gender discrimination, Political science, Legal briefs, Amicus curiae briefs, Men, Attorneys, Judicial rulings, Lower courts, Statutory law
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The intention of this article is to understand the effect of the solicitor general as amicus curiae on the sex discrimination cases heard by the Supreme Court. The solicitor general is of great interest as he is the representative of the incumbent administration in Court. Thus, support by the Court for his position can be seen as a measure of responsiveness to the executive branch. Assessing the independent impact of the solicitor general requires that other factors that might affect the Court's decisions must be controlled. Therefore, we develop a model of Supreme Court decision making that includes internal, external, dynamic and case factors. The model, estimated by probit, explains 58 percent of the variation in the cases and predicts 81 percent of the cases correctly. The role of the solicitor general is shown to be crucial, even after all other factors are controlled.
The Western Political Quarterly © 1988 University of Utah