You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
But Do They Have to See It to Know It? The Supreme Court's Obscenity and Pornography Decisions
Timothy M. Hagle
The Western Political Quarterly
Vol. 44, No. 4 (Dec., 1991), pp. 1039-1054
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/448806
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Judicial rulings, Obscenity, Pornography, Lower courts, Variable coefficients, Search and seizure, United States Supreme Court opinions, Statistical estimation, Decision theory
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Renewed interest in obscenity and pornography by governments, academics, and antipornography groups indicates the Court's decisions in this area deserve closer examination. Using the framework of cognitive-cybernetic theory, this study tests media impact on the Court in this area. Several studies have used multivariate analysis to explain Court behavior. This approach has been successful in studies focusing on general topics and in the area of search and seizure. This study also tests the applicability of using multivariate analysis combined with broad-based factors to explain the Court's behavior in a specific issue area. Results of probit estimations show the materials' media have little or no impact on the Court's decisions. A model with only three broadly based variables, however, accounts for 86 percent of the Court's decisions in this area.
The Western Political Quarterly © 1991 University of Utah