You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
U. S. Economic Aid and Political Repression: An Empirical Evaluation of U. S. Foreign Policy
Patrick M. Regan
Political Research Quarterly
Vol. 48, No. 3 (Sep., 1995), pp. 613-628
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/449005
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Human rights, Repression, Economic aid, Foreign aid, Countries, Aid evaluation, Democracy, Abuse evaluations, Disbursements, Modeling
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The U.S. Congress has mandated that foreign aid be used in a manner that distances the U.S. from regimes which consistently violate the human rights of their populations, and promotes more acceptable human rights records in recipient countries. There has been considerable scholarly attention devoted to the first of these congressional mandates, though as yet little effort has been made to evaluate the effectiveness of U.S. foreign aid programs in actually changing human rights behavior. This essay is a first attempt at evaluating the impact of changes in economic assistance on changes in the amount of political abuse perpetrated by those on the receiving end of the assistance programs. Although others have shown that Carter and Reagan distributed their respective aid programs differently, the findings presented below demonstrate that economic aid has no discernable effect on the human rights records of the recipients; this result holds across both the Carter and Reagan administrations.
Political Research Quarterly © 1995 University of Utah