Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

How to Make a Flying Squirrel: Glaucomys Anatomy in Phylogenetic Perspective

Richard W. Thorington, Jr. and Erica M. Santana
Journal of Mammalogy
Vol. 88, No. 4 (Aug., 2007), pp. 882-896
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498733
Page Count: 15
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
How to Make a Flying Squirrel: Glaucomys Anatomy in Phylogenetic Perspective
Preview not available

Abstract

Molecular evidence strongly supports the derivation of flying squirrels from tree squirrels, with the sister group being the Holarctic tree squirrels (Sciurus) and their close relatives. We present a rationale for the hypothesis that the transition occurred among small squirrels, and we propose using the northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) and the southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans) as models. Thus, we compare their morphologies with similar-sized tree squirrels (the Central American dwarf squirrel [Microsciurus alfari] and the western dwarf squirrel [M. mimulus]). We compare body proportions of Glaucomys with those of Microsciurus, considering differences as potential adaptations for gliding associated with wing loading, aspect ratio, and parasitic drag. We use the following measurements: lengths of the centra of the thoracic, lumbar, sacral, and caudal vertebrae; and lengths of the long bones (humerus, radius, femur, and tibia), metacarpals, metatarsals, and proximal phalanges of the hands and feet. We then compare these proportions of Microsciurus with those of other species of Sciurini, and the proportions of Glaucomys with other species of Pteromyini, to determine if each is representative or derived within its clade. Members of the genus Glaucomys exhibit relative elongation of the lumbar vertebrae and the forearm, relevant to wing loading and aspect ratio, relative lengthening of the midcaudal vertebrae, and relative shortening of the more distal caudal vertebrae, perhaps of importance for stability and control. Members of the genus Glaucomys also have shorter hands and feet, but these appeared to be elongated in Microsciurus, rather than shortened in Glaucomys, leaving the issue of parasitic drag moot. Finally, we speculate on the genetic changes that have produced these morphological modifications and may facilitate the evolution of gliding flight.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
882
    882
  • Thumbnail: Page 
883
    883
  • Thumbnail: Page 
884
    884
  • Thumbnail: Page 
885
    885
  • Thumbnail: Page 
886
    886
  • Thumbnail: Page 
887
    887
  • Thumbnail: Page 
888
    888
  • Thumbnail: Page 
889
    889
  • Thumbnail: Page 
890
    890
  • Thumbnail: Page 
891
    891
  • Thumbnail: Page 
892
    892
  • Thumbnail: Page 
893
    893
  • Thumbnail: Page 
894
    894
  • Thumbnail: Page 
895
    895
  • Thumbnail: Page 
896
    896