Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

New Light on Ancient Chinese Military Texts: Notes on Their Nature and Evolution, and the Development of Military Specialization in Warring States China

Robin D. S. Yates
T'oung Pao
Second Series, Vol. 74, Livr. 4/5 (1988), pp. 211-248
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4528419
Page Count: 38
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($34.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
New Light on Ancient Chinese Military Texts: Notes on Their Nature and Evolution, and the Development of Military Specialization in Warring States China
Preview not available

Abstract

This article studies the four categories into which military texts were divided in the Han Shu bibliography in the light of newly discovered materials in order to answer the following questions: when do military texts first appear in China, what is their relation to other contemporary texts, what is their rhetorical form, how do military concepts change over time, were there military specialists who formed a self-conscious group, and did their ideas influence philosophy and did their practices influence administrative and civilian bureaucratic techniques? It is concluded that military texts first appeared in ca. 500 B.C. and that the earliest extant text is the Sun-tzu ping-fa. Certain techniques and ideas, such as hsing-ming ("form and name") first appeared in military contexts and were later adopted by political philosophers. In rhetorical form, the Mohist works were the most introverted and directed at specialists within their own school, while all four types of military experts influenced later Chinese theories of war and are represented in technical manuals and military encyclopediae through the Ming dynasty. Finally, it is argued that the development of military specialization in the Warring States was an extremely important component of the cultural, administrative, and organizational evolution in China and directly influenced the form of the later Chinese state.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[211]
    [211]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
212
    212
  • Thumbnail: Page 
213
    213
  • Thumbnail: Page 
214
    214
  • Thumbnail: Page 
215
    215
  • Thumbnail: Page 
216
    216
  • Thumbnail: Page 
217
    217
  • Thumbnail: Page 
218
    218
  • Thumbnail: Page 
219
    219
  • Thumbnail: Page 
220
    220
  • Thumbnail: Page 
221
    221
  • Thumbnail: Page 
222
    222
  • Thumbnail: Page 
223
    223
  • Thumbnail: Page 
224
    224
  • Thumbnail: Page 
225
    225
  • Thumbnail: Page 
226
    226
  • Thumbnail: Page 
227
    227
  • Thumbnail: Page 
228
    228
  • Thumbnail: Page 
229
    229
  • Thumbnail: Page 
230
    230
  • Thumbnail: Page 
231
    231
  • Thumbnail: Page 
232
    232
  • Thumbnail: Page 
233
    233
  • Thumbnail: Page 
234
    234
  • Thumbnail: Page 
235
    235
  • Thumbnail: Page 
236
    236
  • Thumbnail: Page 
237
    237
  • Thumbnail: Page 
238
    238
  • Thumbnail: Page 
239
    239
  • Thumbnail: Page 
240
    240
  • Thumbnail: Page 
241
    241
  • Thumbnail: Page 
242
    242
  • Thumbnail: Page 
243
    243
  • Thumbnail: Page 
244
    244
  • Thumbnail: Page 
245
    245
  • Thumbnail: Page 
246
    246
  • Thumbnail: Page 
247
    247
  • Thumbnail: Page 
248
    248