Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Allopreening as Agonistic Behaviour

C. J. O. Harrison
Behaviour
Vol. 24, No. 3/4 (1965), pp. 161-209
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4533105
Page Count: 49
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($34.00)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Allopreening as Agonistic Behaviour
Preview not available

Abstract

Data has been assembled on the incidence of allopreening (= mutual preening) in various species, and from this, and from personal observations, views on its causation and function have been derived. The term "allopreening" with its converse "autopreening", was chosen in preference to "mutual preening" to avoid ambiguity; and the terms "non-reciprocal", "reciprocal", and "simultaneous", have been used to describe the type of allopreening. Information was obtained, or observations made, on allopreening in 41 different avian families. In most species it resembles the attention given to plumage during autopreening. Since the presence of plumage does not invariably elicit preening behaviour, the behaviour associated with allopreening was examined for evidence of its causation. It was found to be closely linked with aggressive behaviour, and in many species attack appeared to give way to allopreening, which appeared to be a replacement, or outlet, for it. If allopreening replaces aggression to differing degrees some evidence of the change can be expected. The usual form of attack is pecking at the head. From observations of captive birds it has been found that submissive postures appear to reduce attacks to light pecking, and that when allopreening species respond to attacks of individuals of other species as though this were allopreening the attack is frustrated, and through habituation may decrease until it resembles allopreening. In the cowbirds preening invitation postures have induced allopreening in some species which do not normally show this behaviour. In such circumstances allopreening is considered to be the direct result of the frustration of the aggressive drive and to be displacement behaviour having a similar initial movement. In addition to this there appears to be little evidence that allopreening occurs as a normal form of preening behaviour. When its functional value as preening is examined it is found that although such preening usually occurs on areas of plumage which a bird cannot reach for itself, yet it occurs only in a minority of species; there is no evidence that species which lack it are at any disadvantage, and in many species where it does occur it occupies only a brief part of the breeding period. It does not therefore appear to be of value as plumage maintenance. Preening invitation postures are considered to be postures resulting from thwarted fleeing, appeasing, or withdrawing behaviour, combined with head positions which initially result from attempts to protect the eyes from, or evade, the bill of the preener without moving away. These head positions could function as cut-off postures in which the aggressor ceases to be visible and the tendency to flee is reduced. Allopreening can be regarded as a form of agonistic behaviour in which the normal tendencies of attacking or fleeing, when two individuals are in close proximity, are in conflict with sexual and opposing attacking and fleeing tendencies. In the attacked bird thwarted fleeing will tend to result in a fluffed posture, while the head positions will "cut-off" the aggressor and reduce still further the fleeing tendencies. In the attacking bird the thwarting of the aggressive tendencies by the refusal of the other bird to flee, together with possible sexual and fleeing conflict, will create a situation where displacement behaviour might be expected, and where the confrontation of the aggressor with the raised feathers of the recipient will increase the likelihood of preening behaviour. This behaviour appears to have become fixed and ritualised in some species. An examination of the known incidence of allopreening, which has been summarised for the Families concerned, shows that certain characters reoccur in association with it and may be factors determining its appearance. These are: Restricted site, where two individuals are forced into close proximity either because of the nature of the nest-site or because they cannot move easily on land; Long absence, which might increase aggressive tendencies; Sociability, such as colony breeding or clumping together, involving close proximity; Long pair-bond, where individuals are in each other's company for a long period; Sexual monomorphism, the sexes closely resembling each other with possibilities of non-recognition on first encounter. There factors make it possible to define the type of bird likely to show allopreening. The one outstanding factor is the enforced proximity of the two individuals. In some species there is apparent evidence of allopreening soliciting by males, which might either be a submissive display by a dominant bird reducing the likelihood of aggressive behaviour, or might indicate a change of dominance during a particular period. There are, in some genera where most species allopreen, odd species which do not show it, but which do show special greeting ceremonies on occasions when allopreening might be expected. These ceremonies might be alternative ceremonies replacing allopreening.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[161]
    [161]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
162
    162
  • Thumbnail: Page 
163
    163
  • Thumbnail: Page 
164
    164
  • Thumbnail: Page 
165
    165
  • Thumbnail: Page 
166
    166
  • Thumbnail: Page 
167
    167
  • Thumbnail: Page 
168
    168
  • Thumbnail: Page 
169
    169
  • Thumbnail: Page 
170
    170
  • Thumbnail: Page 
171
    171
  • Thumbnail: Page 
172
    172
  • Thumbnail: Page 
173
    173
  • Thumbnail: Page 
174
    174
  • Thumbnail: Page 
175
    175
  • Thumbnail: Page 
176
    176
  • Thumbnail: Page 
177
    177
  • Thumbnail: Page 
178
    178
  • Thumbnail: Page 
179
    179
  • Thumbnail: Page 
180
    180
  • Thumbnail: Page 
181
    181
  • Thumbnail: Page 
182
    182
  • Thumbnail: Page 
183
    183
  • Thumbnail: Page 
184
    184
  • Thumbnail: Page 
185
    185
  • Thumbnail: Page 
186
    186
  • Thumbnail: Page 
187
    187
  • Thumbnail: Page 
188
    188
  • Thumbnail: Page 
189
    189
  • Thumbnail: Page 
190
    190
  • Thumbnail: Page 
191
    191
  • Thumbnail: Page 
192
    192
  • Thumbnail: Page 
193
    193
  • Thumbnail: Page 
194
    194
  • Thumbnail: Page 
195
    195
  • Thumbnail: Page 
196
    196
  • Thumbnail: Page 
197
    197
  • Thumbnail: Page 
198
    198
  • Thumbnail: Page 
199
    199
  • Thumbnail: Page 
200
    200
  • Thumbnail: Page 
201
    201
  • Thumbnail: Page 
202
    202
  • Thumbnail: Page 
203
    203
  • Thumbnail: Page 
204
    204
  • Thumbnail: Page 
205
    205
  • Thumbnail: Page 
206
    206
  • Thumbnail: Page 
207
    207
  • Thumbnail: Page 
208
    208
  • Thumbnail: Page 
209
    209