You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Temporal Structure in Stickleback Behaviour
P. Sevenster, E. Feuth-De Bruijn and J. J. Huisman
Vol. 132, No. 15/16, Second International Symposium on Stickleback Behaviour. Part Two (Dec., 1995), pp. 1267-1284
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4535335
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Circadian rhythm, Periodicity, Breeding, Scotophase, Fish, Female animals, Anadromous fishes, Luminous intensity, Recordings, Food
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Research was started into a possible circadian periodicity in the behaviour of the three-spined stickleback. The behaviour of solitary males in the sexual phase of their breeding cycle was studied under constant conditions, including illumination of constant brightness (LL). No, 'free-running', circadian rhythm was found. Both the frequency of nest-visits and the rate of creeping-through (which shows an ultradian periodicity) were remarkably constant over long periods. Also, operant conditioning experiments, in which the male could switch the lights on or off, did not reveal any circadian fluctuation in the preference for light or dark. In the course of the long-term recordings 'rest-periods' were found, lasting some 10 to 50 minutes, in which the fish was surprisingly inactive, and did not visit the nest. Although some characteristics of these 'rest-periods' seem to point to a 'sleep-like' nature, others seem to argue against this.
Behaviour © 1995 Brill