Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Contrafreeloading in Starlings: Testing the Information Hypothesis

D. Bean, G. J. Mason and M. Bateson
Behaviour
Vol. 136, No. 10/11 (Dec., 1999), pp. 1267-1282
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4535675
Page Count: 16
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($34.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Contrafreeloading in Starlings: Testing the Information Hypothesis
Preview not available

Abstract

Contrafreeloading (CFL) behaviour, in which animals forage persistently in patches that require effort to exploit when patches containing ad lib. food are easily available, seems to contradict the predictions of optimal foraging theory. However, it has been proposed that contrafreeloaders are in fact exploiting a hidden resource, namely information about patches that may be useful in future foraging attempts. We performed two experiments on starlings Sturnus vulgaris to test this hypothesis by determining the circumstances in which CFL occurs and assessing whether any useful information is acquired by animals performing the behaviour. In accordance with previous results we found that CFL is reduced when foragers are previously deprived of food and also when there are means of gathering information aside from sampling (namely when patches that require effort to exploit can be visually inspected). We also found that useful information is acquired by birds that perform CFL, in that when subsequently tested in extinction with the best patch removed they reliably chose the patch that had been the second best. These results are consistent with the information gain hypothesis. However, birds with low levels of CFL did not perform discernably worse in this test of patch knowledge and experimental reductions in CFL achieved through deprivation treatments did not produce apparent reductions in useful information possessed.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[1267]
    [1267]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1268
    1268
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1269
    1269
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1270
    1270
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1271
    1271
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1272
    1272
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1273
    1273
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1274
    1274
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1275
    1275
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1276
    1276
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1277
    1277
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1278
    1278
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1279
    1279
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1280
    1280
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1281
    1281
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1282
    1282